An endocrinologist discusses alternative medicine in an upcoming clinical conference.


From the press release:

Making the Case for Alternative Medicine

Alternative medicine has a place in the traditional endocrinologist’s practice. But just what is appropriate, and what is misleading? This question will be explored at the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) 17th Annual Meeting & Clinical Congress, by Marc R. Blackman, MD, at 2:15 p.m. on Saturday, May 17, 2008, at the Walt Disney World Dolphin Resort in Orlando.

In his analysis, Dr. Blackman will highlight possible uses for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, while not overlooking possible pitfalls.

“A justifiable argument can be made for alternative treatment in some situations,” Dr. Blackman said. “However, it is important to note that what is natural isn’t always good.”

Blackman will analyze the recent FDA action against bio-identical hormone replacement therapy. The FDA sent letters warning several pharmaceutical manufacturers that their claims about the safety and effectiveness of their “bio-identical hormones” are unsupported by medical evidence, and are considered false and misleading. Other unsupported claims insisted that the drugs are better than FDA-approved menopausal hormone therapy drugs and can be used to prevent and treat diseases like Alzheimer’s, stroke, and various forms of cancer. Blackman will interpret these events to see what can be learned from them.

This issue will be examined at the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) 17th Annual Meeting & Clinical Congress, at 2:15 p.m. on Thursday, May 15, 2008, at the Walt Disney World Dolphin Resort in Orlando.

I’m not exactly sure why bio-identical hormones are considered alternative medicine, but it sounds like the talk will offer pros and cons.

___________

Sponsorship

body { margin: 0; padding: 0; }

___________
The Law Offices of Michael H. Cohen offers corporate legal services, litigation consultation, and expertise in health law with a unique focus on holistic, alternative, complementary, and integrative medical therapies. The law firm represents medical doctors, allied health professionals (from psychologists to nurses and dentists) and other clinicians (from chiropractors to naturopathic physicians, massage therapists, and acupuncturists), entrepreneurs, hospitals, and educational organizations, health care institutions, and individuals and corporations.

Michael H. Cohen is Principal in Law Offices of Michael H. Cohen and also President of The Institute for Integrative and Energy Medicine, a nonprofit organization exploring legal, regulatory, ethical, and health policy issues in the judicious integration of complementary and alternative medical therapies (such as acupuncture and traditional oriental medicine, chiropractic, naturopathic medicine, homeopathy, massage therapy, energy healing, and herbal medicine) and conventional clinical care. Michael H. Cohen is author of books on health care law, regulation, ethics and policy dealing with complementary, alternative and integrative medicine, including Healing at the Borderland of Medicine and Religion, Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Legal Boundaries and Regulatory Perspectives (1998), Beyond Complementary Medicine: Legal and Ethical Perspectives on Health Care and Human Evolution (2000), and Future Medicine: Ethical Dilemmas, Regulatory Challenges, and Therapeutic Pathways to Health Care and Healing in Human Transformation (2003).

Sponsorship

body { margin: 0; padding: 0; }

Sponsorship

body { margin: 0; padding: 0; }

___________
Health care and corporate lawyer Michael H. Cohen has been admitted to the Bar of California, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington D.C. In addition to qualifying as a U.S. attorney, he has been admitted and to the Bar of England and Wales as a Solicitor (non-practicing). For more information regarding the law practice of attorney Michael H. Cohen, see the FAQs for the Law Offices of Michael H. Cohen. Thank you for visiting the Complementary and Alternative Medicine Law Blog.

___________